Print Page  Close Window

SEC Filings
10-K
TERRAFORM POWER, INC. filed this Form 10-K on 03/07/2018
Entire Document
 

Facility Category / Portfolio
 
Location
 
Nameplate Capacity (MW)
 
Net Nameplate Capacity (MW)
 
Number of Sites
 
Weighted Average Remaining Duration of PPA (Years)1
Wind Utility:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
South Plains I
 
Texas
 
200.0

 
200.0

 
1

 
10

California Ridge
 
Illinois
 
217.1

 
195.6

 
1

 
15

Bishop Hill
 
Illinois
 
211.4

 
190.5

 
1

 
15

Rattlesnake
 
Texas
 
207.2

 
186.7

 
1

 
10

Prairie Breeze
 
Nebraska
 
200.6

 
180.7

 
1

 
21

Cohocton
 
New York
 
125.0

 
125.0

 
1

 
2

Stetson I & II
 
Maine
 
82.5

 
82.5

 
2

 
2

Rollins
 
Maine
 
60.0

 
60.0

 
1

 
14

Mars Hill
 
Maine
 
42.0

 
42.0

 
1

 
2

Sheffield
 
Vermont
 
40.0

 
40.0

 
1

 
10

Bull Hill
 
Maine
 
34.5

 
34.5

 
1

 
9

Kaheawa Wind Power I
 
Hawaii
 
30.0

 
30.0

 
1

 
8

Kahuku
 
Hawaii
 
30.0

 
30.0

 
1

 
13

Kaheawa Wind Power II
 
Hawaii
 
21.0

 
21.0

 
1

 
15

Steel Winds I & II
 
New York
 
35.0

 
35.0

 
2

 
2

Raleigh
 
Ontario
 
78.0

 
78.0

 
1

 
13

Total Wind Utility
 
 
 
1,614.3

 
1,531.5

 
18

 
11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Renewable Energy Facilities
 
2,697.5

 
2,606.4

 
533

 
14

———
(1)
Calculated as of December 31, 2017.
(2)
These portfolios consist of renewable energy facilities located in multiple locations within the U.S., as follows:
CD DG Portfolio: California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania
DG 2015 Portfolio 2: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Utah and Vermont
U.S. Projects 2014: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Puerto Rico
DG 2014 Portfolio 1: Arizona, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Texas, Vermont and Puerto Rico
TEG: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Pennsylvania
HES: Massachusetts, New Jersey and Pennsylvania
Summit Solar Projects (U.S.): California, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland and New Jersey
U.S. Projects 2009-2013: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon and Puerto Rico
SUNE XVIII: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York and Texas
Enfinity: Arizona, California and Ohio
SunE Solar Fund X: California, Maryland and New Mexico
Blackhawk Solar Portfolio: Utah, Florida, Nevada and California

Seasonality and Resource Availability

The amount of electricity produced and revenues generated by our solar generation facilities is dependent in part on the amount of sunlight, or irradiation, where the assets are located. As shorter daylight hours in winter months result in less irradiation, the electricity generated by these facilities will vary depending on the season. Irradiation can also be variable at a particular location from period to period due to weather or other meteorological patterns, which can affect operating results. As the great majority of our solar power plants are located in the Northern hemisphere, our solar portfolio’s power generation will be at its lowest during the first and fourth quarters of each year. Therefore, we expect our first and fourth quarter solar revenue generation to be lower than other quarters.



12